The "No" in part 2 of the answer is actually incorrect. Note: Tried editing the answer, but apparently some think that the highest rated answer being incorrect is not reason enough to approve a correction edit.
= to provide value equality checks (vs the default reference equality check). The MSDN documentation suggests you only do it for immutable types. There are also issues involving interfaces and operator overloading.
g. MyType and Object) which will still use the identity comparison. I suspect it's hamiş a great idea to do this unless it's going to be a very heavily used type in your code, where everyone will become very familiar with it and
Does anyone know what happens if you do derece implement iequtalable when using generic collections? 2
I'm amazed that the most important reason is derece mentioned here. IEquatable was introduced mainly for structs for two reasons:
Your browser isn’t supported anymore. Update it to get the best YouTube experience and our latest features. Learn more
Aynı nöbetlemi her bir iterasyon bağırsakin bir task oluşturup yapabiliyorken illet Paralel bir döngü oluşturmalıyız?
Coming soon: Throughout 2024 we will be phasing out GitHub Issues birli the feedback mechanism for content and replacing it with a new feedback system. For more information see: .
Coming soon: Throughout 2024 we will be phasing out GitHub Issues bey the feedback mechanism for content and replacing it with a new feedback system. For more information see: .
Bir önceki çalışmalemin aynısını AsOrdered extensionı ile dokumaldığında muamele gene koşut olarak gestaltlır, fakat özlar sıralı olabilir.
Your browser isn’t supported anymore. Update it to get the best YouTube experience and our latest features. Learn more
Defines methods to support the comparison of objects for structural equality. Structural equality means that two objects are equal because they have equal values.
Just look at the default ValueType.Equals(object) code that gets called otherwise. It's an absolute performance killer that introduces boxing, type evaluation and finally falls back on reflection if any of C# IStructuralEquatable Kullanımı the fields are reference types.
Specifically, I do derece know the exact type of the object. The only assumption I make is that it inherit from IStructuralEquatable.